Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zink, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zink, A. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 5: 687-693
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Quantifying the costs and benefits of parental care in female treehoppers

Andrew G. Zink

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Address correspondence to A.G. Zink, who is now at the Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. E-mail: agzink{at}ucdavis.edu.

Parental protection of eggs represents one of the most basic forms of parental care. Theory suggests that even such basic parental investment represents a trade-off between current offspring survival and future reproductive success. However, few studies have quantified the underlying costs and benefits of parental care for marked individuals across an entire lifetime. I marked and followed 370 females of Publilia concava (Hemiptera: Membracidae) that exhibited a range of guarding durations for their first clutch. Greater hatching success was correlated with longer guarding durations, and a removal experiment verified that female presence was responsible for a twofold increase in hatching success. On the other hand, females that remained to guard eggs had a lower number and size of future broods, suggesting that parental care may reduce lifetime fecundity. Marked females exhibited a bimodal distribution of guarding durations, reflecting the extreme tactics of immediate abandonment or remaining through hatching. Estimates of lifetime number of nymphs produced by females that abandon eggs early versus guard eggs through hatching revealed roughly equivalent levels of fitness. I discuss the conditions under which we might expect a female to adopt each of the alternative tactics, given the costs and benefits of parental care that were quantified in this study.

Key words: brood desertion, egg guarding, Membracidae, parental care, treehopper.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
K. Kosciuch, T. Parker, and B. Sandercock
Nest desertion by a cowbird host: an antiparasite behavior or a response to egg loss?
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2006; 17(6): 917 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
B. S. Green and M. I. McCormick
O2 replenishment to fish nests: males adjust brood care to ambient conditions and brood development
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 389 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.