Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Werner, N. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lotem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Werner, N. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lotem, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 6: 749-756
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Helping opportunities and space segregation in cooperatively breeding cichlids

Noam Y. Wernera, Sigal Balshineb, Brenda Leachc and Arnon Lotema

a Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel b Department of Psychology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada c Department of Biology, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

Address correspondence to Noam Y. Werner. E-mail: wernerny{at}post.tau.ac.il.

Studies of cooperative breeding have largely ignored the role of conflict among helpers and how it shapes group dynamics and helping behavior. In the present study, performing laboratory experiments with cooperatively breeding cichlids from Lake Tanganyika, we show that secondary group members (potential helpers) occupy home ranges within the group territory and may be aggressive to one another. Experimental removal of secondary group members allowed the individual next in rank to move closer to the removed individual's home range. In the field, dominant secondary group members stayed closer to the brood chamber than did subordinate group members of similar size, and proximity to the brood chamber was related to the length of time spent inside. We suggest that space segregation and competition among secondary group members is common in these cichlids, and may limit the opportunities to provide help.

Key words: Cichlidae, competition, conflict, Lake Tanganyika, Neolamprologus, reproductive skew, territoriality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
K. A. Stiver, J. L. Fitzpatrick, J. K. Desjardins, B. D. Neff, J. S. Quinn, and S. Balshine
The role of genetic relatedness among social mates in a cooperative breeder
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2008; 19(4): 816 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
J.L Fitzpatrick, J.K Desjardins, N Milligan, K.A Stiver, R Montgomerie, and S Balshine
Female-mediated causes and consequences of status change in a social fish
Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2008; 275(1637): 929 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
D. Heg, R. Bergmuller, D. Bonfils, O. Otti, Z. Bachar, R. Burri, G. Heckel, and M. Taborsky
Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 419 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
K. A Stiver, P. Dierkes, M. Taborsky, H Lisle Gibbs, and S. Balshine
Relatedness and helping in fish: examining the theoretical predictions
Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2005; 272(1572): 1593 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
L. Brouwer, D. Heg, and M. Taborsky
Experimental evidence for helper effects in a cooperatively breeding cichlid
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 667 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.