Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muñoz, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Muñoz, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 1: 129-136
© 2004 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Testing a new version of the size-advantage hypothesis for sex change: sperm competition and size-skew effects in the bucktooth parrotfish, Sparisoma radians

Roldan C. Muñoz and Robert R. Warner

Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106–9610, USA

Address correspondence to R.C. Muñoz, who is now at NOAA Beaufort Laboratory, Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, 101 Pivers Island Road, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA. E-mail: roldan.munoz{at}noaa.gov.

A variety of field studies suggest that sex change in animals may be more complicated than originally depicted by the size-advantage hypothesis. A modification of the size-advantage hypothesis, the expected reproductive success threshold model, proposes that sperm competition and size-fecundity skew can strongly affect reproductive pay-offs. Size-fecundity skew occurs if a large female's fecundity is markedly higher than the aggregate of the other members of her social group and, together with paternity dilution from sperm competition, can produce situations in which large females benefit by deferring sex change to smaller females. Deferral by large females can create sex-size distributions characterized by the presence of large females and small sex-changed males, and it is precisely these distributions that the traditional size-advantage model cannot explain. We tested the predictions of the new model with the bucktooth parrotfish, Sparisoma radians, on coral reefs in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Collections and spawning observations determined that the local environmental regime of S. radians is characterized by pervasive sperm competition (accompanying 30% of spawns) and factors that can produce substantial size-fecundity skew in social groups. Dominant male removal experiments demonstrate that the largest females in social groups often do not change sex when provided an opportunity. Instead, smaller, lower-ranking females change sex when a harem vacancy arises. This pattern of sex change is in contrast to virtually all previous studies of social control of sex change in fishes, but provides strong support for the general predictions of the expected reproductive success threshold model.

Key words: coral reefs, Labridae, protogyny, Scaridae, seagrass beds, size-fecundity skew, social control of sex change, sperm competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. A. Proestou, M. R. Goldsmith, and S. Twombly
Patterns of Male Reproductive Success in Crepidula fornicata Provide New Insight for Sex Allocation and Optimal Sex Change
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2008; 214(2): 194 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. W. Petersen
Sexual selection and reproductive success in hermaphroditic seabasses
Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 46(4): 439 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.