Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wallander, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wallander, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 1: 158-162
© 2004 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Kin selection and reciprocity in flight formation?

Malte Andersson and Johan Wallander

Department of Zoology, Göteborg University, Box 463, SE 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden

Address correspondence to M. Andersson. E-mail: malte.andersson{at}zool.gu.se.

The reasons for conspicuous "V" and other flight formations in birds are debated. Theory and recent empirical advances show that energy saving is one important function of flight formations, but some aspects remain poorly understood. Combining theories of animal flight and sociality, we suggest that some of the variation in flight formations has its base in kin selection and reciprocation. The bird leading an acute V formation saves less energy than does the trailing participants. The disadvantage of leading is reduced in more obtuse formations, and when the longitudinal distance between neighbors is small, the leading bird can save about as much energy as others. Therefore, acute V formations are predicted to occur mainly in circumstances conducive to kin selection or reciprocity. These mechanisms seem possible, for example, in small flocks of adults with offspring, such as in swans, geese, and cranes. Inclusive fitness advantages may then favor an energetically expensive leader role for adults. In small groups, reciprocity is also possible among unrelated adults that recognize each other and take turns leading the V formation. In contrast, obtuse formations are expected in large flocks of unrelated individuals, such as spring flocks of waders migrating long distances. Possibilities for testing these ideas are discussed.

Key words: aerial parental care, bird migration, energy saving, kin selection, prediction, reciprocity, shape variation, testing, theory, V formation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.