Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duchateau, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Boomsma, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Duchateau, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Boomsma, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 1: 71-82
© 2004 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Sex ratio variation in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris

Marie José Duchateaua, Hayo H. W. Velthuisa and Jacobus J. Boomsmaa,b

a Department of Behavioural Biology, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80086, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands b Zoological Institute, Department of Population Ecology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Address correspondence to J. J. Boomsma at the University of Copenhagen. E-mail: JJBoomsma{at}zi.ku.dk.

Patterns of sex allocation in bumblebees have been enigmatic and difficult to interpret in either a Fisherian context or in a kin-selection perspective. We gathered data on several hundred laboratory-reared colonies of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and analyzed sex allocation as a function of diapause duration and a series of variables describing colony development. Our analyses addressed both sex allocation patterns across different cohorts of laboratory colonies reared at different times and sex allocation patterns across individual colonies within these cohorts. We used path analysis to test a hypothetical model linking a sequence of colony-development variables to the crucial reproductive parameters at the end of the colony life cycle. We show that (1) population-wide patterns of sex allocation show equal investment in the sexes and are thus consistent with queen control, but not with worker control. (2) A significant part of the colony-level and cohort-specific variation in sex allocation is related to the hibernation conditions of founding queens: Queens with longer than average winter diapause produce larger cohorts of first and second brood workers, switch to haploid eggs early, and produce colonies that raise mostly males and few new queens and vice versa. (3) Colony-level sex allocation is significantly related to the time span between the switch point (date of first haploid egg laid by the queen) and the competition point (date of first haploid egg laid by one of the workers): the longer this period, the more male biased the sex ratio. (4) The breeding constraints of an annual life cycle, the short reproductive season, and the presumably high premium on early produced males imply that bumblebee workers have no realistic options to capitalize on their relatedness asymmetry toward the different kinds of reproductive brood by biasing the sex ratio.

Key words: Bombus terrestris, bumblebees, colony development, queen control, reproductive strategies, sex allocation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. Meunier, S. A. West, and M. Chapuisat
Split sex ratios in the social Hymenoptera: a meta-analysis
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 382 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.