Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 1: 83-87
© 2004 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Does social complexity lead to sex-biased dispersal in polygynous mammals? A test on ground-dwelling sciurids
U.M.R. C.N.R.S no. 5558 "Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive," Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43, boulevard du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
Address correspondence to Sébastien Devillard. E-mail: devillar{at}biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr.
Mating systems are well known to influence the dispersing sex, but the magnitude of the sex-biased dispersal has not actually been measured, whereas many theoretical predictions have been made. In this study, we tested a new prediction about the coevolution between natal dispersal and sociality from a recent evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) approach. From a comparative approach, we showed that, in agreement with the model, the male-biased dispersal increases with increasing level of sociality in polygynous ground-dwelling sciurids. In addition, the increase in male-biased dispersal with increasing sociality results from an increase in male dispersal rates, whereas female dispersal rates remain constant, contrary to what is expected from the ESS model. Although the mating system through the level of polygyny could act as a confounding factor, our results strengthen previous work that states that inbreeding avoidance plays a major role in the evolution of dispersal for the most social mammalian species.
Key words: comparative analysis, ground-dwelling sciurids, mammals, sex-biased dispersal, sociality.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. K. Hanski and V. Selonen Female-biased natal dispersal in the Siberian flying squirrel Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 60 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Randall, K. Rogovin, P. G. Parker, and J. A. Eimes Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 961 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
