Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 2: 248-254
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 2 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Discrimination and classification of foraging paths produced by search-tactic models

Chris L. Higgins and Richard E. Strauss

Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

Address correspondence to C. L. Higgins. E-mail: chris.higgins{at}ttu.edu.

Search tactics are cognitive processes, or decision mechanisms, that organisms use to locate available resources such as food, mates, refugia, and high-quality habitats. However, our knowledge of the actual tactics that animals use while searching for resources is limited, and very little empirical evidence has been accumulated. Therefore, we developed a suite of search-tactic models (1) to simulate possible searching behaviors of mobile organisms so that inferences can be made about their decision mechanisms, and (2) to determine the extent to which different models produce paths that approximate a globally optimal solution. The search-tactic models included deterministic and probabilistic searches in attempt to characterize biologically plausible searching behaviors. Classical linear multivariate methods (discriminant function analysis, Mahalanobis distances) and nonlinear artificial neural networks were used to discriminate the paths produced by the different models and to classify "unknown" foraging paths into one of the search-tactic models, based on the geometry of the resulting paths. Both linear and nonlinear analyses suggested that it is possible for animals to use a nearest-neighbor search tactic to search with near-optimum efficiency without having complete knowledge of the specific locations of all available resources. Furthermore, both methods of analyses demonstrated that it might be possible to use characteristics of foraging paths in an experimental setting to make inferences about the actual decision mechanisms animals use while searching for resources.

Key words: computer simulation, discrimination, foraging paths, multivariate analysis, neural networks, searching behavior, search tactics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
G. Beauchamp and G. D. Ruxton
Harvesting resources in groups or alone: the case of renewing patches
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 989 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
K. Ohashi and J. D. Thomson
Efficient harvesting of renewing resources
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 592 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.