Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kacelnik, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kacelnik, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 3: 396-399
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 3 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Energetic state during learning affects foraging choices in starlings

Barnaby Marsh, Cynthia Schuck-Paim and Alex Kacelnik

Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

Address correspondence to A. Kacelnik. E-mail: alex.kacelnik{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk.

We investigated the influence of energetic state at the time of acquaintance with a new food source on preference for that source on later encounters, using wild-caught European starlings as subjects. Twelve birds learned to obtain food rewards by pecking at either of two keys identified by color. The keys were encountered in different sessions, while the subjects were food deprived or prefed. Food rewards from both sources were always identical. After an equal number of reinforced trials with each source, the birds were presented with choices between them. The birds significantly preferred the source that had previously delivered food under higher deprivation. We relate these results to findings reported elsewhere of preferences for options previously associated with greater effort. We hypothesize that subjects may attribute value to an option according to the marginal fitness gain associated with this option in the past. Although this process may be adaptive under many circumstances, it violates the assumptions of normative models of choice that imply mechanisms of valuation sensitive to the absolute properties of a payoff or to expected absolute changes in state.

Key words: foraging, hunger, starlings, state-dependent choice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
A. Harlander-Matauschek, F. Wassermann, J. Zentek, and W. Bessei
Laying Hens Learn to Avoid Feathers
Poult. Sci., September 1, 2008; 87(9): 1720 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
L. Pompilio, A. Kacelnik, and S. T. Behmer
State-dependent learned valuation drives choice in an invertebrate.
Science, March 17, 2006; 311(5767): 1613 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. T. Behmer, C. E. Belt, and M. S. Shapiro
Variable rewards and discrimination ability in an insect herbivore: what and how does a hungry locust learn?
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3463 - 3473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.