Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, W.
Right arrow Articles by Zuberbühler, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, W.
Right arrow Articles by Zuberbühler, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 3: 400-411
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 3 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Cooperation and competition in two forest monkeys

Winnie Eckardta,b and Klaus Zuberbühlerb,c,d

a Abteilung Biologie, Fakultät für Biowissenschaften, Pharmazie und Psychologie, Universität Leipzig, BruderstraBe 32, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, b Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques, Taï Monkey Project, B.P. 1303, Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire, c Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Inselstrasse 22, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, and d School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9JP, Scotland

Address correspondence to K. Zuberbühler. E-mail: kz3{at}st-and.ac.uk.

Putty-nosed monkeys, Cercopithecus nictitans stampflii, occur at various sites in West Africa, particularly in the transition zone between rainforest and savannah. The species is sometimes seen in primary rainforest, although at a curiously low density compared with that of other monkey species. We conducted a 24-month field study in the tropical rainforest of Taï National Park, Ivory Coast, and found that putty-nosed monkeys require an ecological niche almost identical to that of the Diana monkeys, Cercopithecus diana diana. Moreover, the niche breadth of putty-nosed monkeys was significantly decreased in the presence of Diana monkeys, suggesting that feeding competition with Diana monkeys kept putty-nosed monkeys from successfully colonizing a rainforest habitat. However, contrary to the interspecies competition hypothesis, groups of both species almost completely overlapped in home ranges and formed near-permanent mixed-species associations, rather than avoiding each other. We hypothesized that Diana monkeys tolerated immigrating putty-nosed monkeys and formed mixed-species groups with them, despite high levels of competition, because of their merit in predation defense. Direct observations and a series of field experiments confirmed that male putty-nosed monkeys play a vital role in defense against crowned eagles, suggesting that putty-nosed monkeys obtain access to feeding trees by offering antipredation benefits to Diana monkeys. We discuss these findings in light of biological market theory.

Key words: alarm calls, biological markets, feeding ecology, mutualism, niche overlap, predation, semantic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. J. Lea, J. P. Barrera, L. M. Tom, and D. T. Blumstein
Heterospecific eavesdropping in a nonsocial species
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
H.S. Sushma and M. Singh
Resource partitioning and interspecific interactions among sympatric rain forest arboreal mammals of the Western Ghats, India
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 479 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.