Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 3: 412-418
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 3 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved
The effect of patch size and competitor number on aggression among foraging house sparrows
a Department of Biology, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd W, Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8, Canada, and b Département des Sciences biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Case postale 8888, succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada
Address correspondence to C. A. Johnson, who is now at the Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1. E-mail: johnsonc{at}uoguelph.ca.
We examined the effect of patch size and competitor number on aggression among house sparrows, Passer domesticus, foraging at patches of seven different sizes in a doubling series (0.014, 0.029, 0.058, 0.116, 0.230, 0.462, and 0.922 m2). Contrary to our expectations, the birds did not defend an entire patch, even when it was small as 0.014 m2. The frequency of aggression among the birds decreased gradually with increasing patch size, in contrast to the step decline predicted by resource defense theory. Moreover, the birds fought more frequently and more intensely as competitor density increased. Both results are consistent with the predictions of a modified hawk-dove model for shared patches. Females were more aggressive and fed at a higher rate than did males. The proportion of females increased as patch size decreased, and aggression became more frequent and intense. Even when patches are shared, patch size has an important effect on the frequency and intensity of foraging competition and the size and composition of foraging groups.
Key words: aggression, competitor density, hawk-dove, interference, patch size, Passer domesticus, resource defense, truncated phenotypic distribution.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. K. Vahl, T. Lok, J. van der Meer, T. Piersma, and F. J. Weissing Spatial clumping of food and social dominance affect interference competition among ruddy turnstones Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 834 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
