Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Setchell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wickings, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Setchell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wickings, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 3: 438-445
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 3 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Sexual swelling in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx): a test of the reliable indicator hypothesis

Joanna M. Setchella,b and E. Jean Wickingsb

a University of Surrey Roehampton, London, UK, and b Centre International de Recherches Médicales, B.P. 769, Franceville, Gabon

Address correspondence to J. M. Setchell. E-mail: mandrills{at}yahoo.co.uk.

Various hypotheses have been proposed to account for the function of sexual swellings in female primates, but few empirical data exist to test predictions arising from these hypotheses. Controversy has recently arisen over a field study that appeared to support the predictions of the reliable indicator hypothesis. This hypothesis proposes that females compete for males or matings, that differences in swelling size between females reliably advertise female quality, and that males use swelling characteristics to differentially allocate mating effort to females with certain swelling characteristics, hence to females of higher quality. To provide an independent test of this hypothesis, we collected data concerning the size and coloration of 40 sexual swellings for 29 semi-free-ranging female mandrills, varying in age and parity, along with data concerning the behavior of males toward the females, and compared these with the long-term reproductive history of the females. We examined the following predictions: (1) swelling characteristics are consistent across subsequent cycles for individual females, (2) swelling characteristics indicate aspects of female reproductive quality, and (3) males prefer to mate with females that show particular swelling characteristics. Our results support prediction 1; we found little change in swelling characteristics across swellings for individual females. However, we found no significant relationships between female reproductive history and swelling characteristics and, thus, no support for prediction 2. Finally, we found only limited support for prediction 3; females with larger (wider) sexual swellings were more likely to have a sperm plug when maximally swollen. However, male mate-guarding was not significantly related to female swelling characteristics. Furthermore, in situations in which more than one female was maximally swollen, the alpha male (who has "free" choice) did not show the most interest in the female with the largest swelling. We conclude that the reliable indicator hypothesis does not explain variation in sexual swellings in female mandrills.

Key words: mandrills, prediction, primates, reproduction, sexual swelling.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
E. Huchard, A. Courtiol, J. A. Benavides, L. A. Knapp, M. Raymond, and G. Cowlishaw
Can fertility signals lead to quality signals? Insights from the evolution of primate sexual swellings
Proc R Soc B, May 22, 2009; 276(1663): 1889 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.