Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forstmeier, W.
Right arrow Articles by Leisler, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Forstmeier, W.
Right arrow Articles by Leisler, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 4: 555-563
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 4 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Repertoire size, sexual selection, and offspring viability in the great reed warbler: changing patterns in space and time

Wolfgang Forstmeier and Bernd Leisler

Max Planck Research Centre for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Schloss Moeggingen, Schlossallee 2, D-78315 Radolfzell, Germany

Address correspondence to W. Forstmeier, who is now at Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK, E-mail: w.forstmeier{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Only a few studies have focussed on the consistency of sexual selection patterns in space and time. One such case is the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus), for which studies in Germany in 1981–1982 and Sweden in 1987–1991 strongly suggested that the size of a male's song repertoire was the target of mate choice and sexual selection. Studying the same German population once again in 1994–2000, we investigated the consistency of these patterns over time as well as between populations. Our reanalysis of the data from 1981–1982 shows that male repertoire size was positively correlated with male pairing success (harem size) and with clutch size (adjusted for seasonal effects), whereas no such correlations were found during 1994–2000 in the same population. We suggest that the earlier correlations were probably caused indirectly by covariation with territory quality, and that a decline in population size has changed the role of territory quality. In the Swedish population, an earlier study found a striking correlation between the size of a male's repertoire and the viability of its offspring, suggesting good-gene effects. In contrast, we found no such correlation in the German population, neither in 1981–1982 nor in 1994–2000. We conclude that repertoire size does not seem to be a very reliable indicator of variation in male quality. Interestingly, the analysis of data from 1994–2000 showed that male pairing success was strongly correlated with measures of strophe length and immediate versatility, traits that have been found to reflect male longevity. Future studies will have to show whether these performance-related traits are more powerful indicators of male quality than is repertoire size.

Key words: female choice, good genes, male-male competition, song, territory quality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
B. Hansson, L. Jack, J. K. Christians, J. M. Pemberton, M. Akesson, H. Westerdahl, S. Bensch, and D. Hasselquist
No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a great reed warbler population
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 157 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. H. Parker, I. R. Barr, and S. C. Griffith
The blue tit's song is an inconsistent signal of male condition
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2006; 17(6): 1029 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.