Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matocq, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lacey, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Matocq, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lacey, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 4: 647-653
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 4 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Philopatry, kin clusters, and genetic relatedness in a population of woodrats (Neotoma macrotis)

Marjorie D. Matocqa,b and Eileen A. Laceya

a Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720–3160, USA<, and b Department of Biological Sciences, Campus Box 8007, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA

Address correspondence to Marjorie Matocq. E-mail: matomarj{at}isu.edu

Studies of highly kin-structured mammal societies have revealed the importance of natal philopatry in determining the distribution of genetic variation within populations. In comparison, the relationship between philopatry and genetic diversity within populations of moderately kin-structured societies has received relatively little attention. Previous studies of Neotoma macrotis have suggested that females form distinct kin clusters. Each kin cluster overlaps spatially with the home range(s) of one or more males that are not related to each other or to the females with which they are spatially associated. To examine interactions between philopatry and genetic structure in this apparently moderately kin-structured species, we characterized spatial and genetic relationships among individually marked females in a population of N. macrotis from central coastal California. Our field studies revealed that, contrary to expectation, females in this population were not strongly philopatric and spatially clustered females were not characterized by high levels of genetic relatedness. Nevertheless, genetic structure was evident within the study population; spatial and genetic distances among females were significantly correlated, suggesting that dispersal patterns influenced genetic structure even in the absence of marked female philopatry. Because females with overlapping spatial distributions were not typically closely related to one another, opportunities for the evolution of kin-selected social behavior (e.g., cooperative care of young) appear to be limited in this population.

Key words: Neotoma macrotis, Neotoma fuscipes, relatedness, female kin clusters, natal philopatry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Csillery, T. Johnson, D. Beraldi, T. Clutton-Brock, D. Coltman, B. Hansson, G. Spong, and J. M. Pemberton
Performance of Marker-Based Relatedness Estimators in Natural Populations of Outbred Vertebrates
Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2091 - 2101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. A. Randall, K. Rogovin, P. G. Parker, and J. A. Eimes
Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 961 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.