Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 4: 647-653
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 4 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved
Philopatry, kin clusters, and genetic relatedness in a population of woodrats (Neotoma macrotis)
a Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 947203160, USA<, and b Department of Biological Sciences, Campus Box 8007, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
Address correspondence to Marjorie Matocq. E-mail: matomarj{at}isu.edu
Studies of highly kin-structured mammal societies have revealed the importance of natal philopatry in determining the distribution of genetic variation within populations. In comparison, the relationship between philopatry and genetic diversity within populations of moderately kin-structured societies has received relatively little attention. Previous studies of Neotoma macrotis have suggested that females form distinct kin clusters. Each kin cluster overlaps spatially with the home range(s) of one or more males that are not related to each other or to the females with which they are spatially associated. To examine interactions between philopatry and genetic structure in this apparently moderately kin-structured species, we characterized spatial and genetic relationships among individually marked females in a population of N. macrotis from central coastal California. Our field studies revealed that, contrary to expectation, females in this population were not strongly philopatric and spatially clustered females were not characterized by high levels of genetic relatedness. Nevertheless, genetic structure was evident within the study population; spatial and genetic distances among females were significantly correlated, suggesting that dispersal patterns influenced genetic structure even in the absence of marked female philopatry. Because females with overlapping spatial distributions were not typically closely related to one another, opportunities for the evolution of kin-selected social behavior (e.g., cooperative care of young) appear to be limited in this population.
Key words: Neotoma macrotis, Neotoma fuscipes, relatedness, female kin clusters, natal philopatry.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Csillery, T. Johnson, D. Beraldi, T. Clutton-Brock, D. Coltman, B. Hansson, G. Spong, and J. M. Pemberton Performance of Marker-Based Relatedness Estimators in Natural Populations of Outbred Vertebrates Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2091 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Randall, K. Rogovin, P. G. Parker, and J. A. Eimes Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 961 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

