Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 11, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2004 15(5):748-756; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/5/748    most recent
arh073v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Reeve, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Reeve, H. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 5 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Mating games: the evolution of human mating transactions

Sarah E. Hilla and H. Kern Reeveb

a Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78731, USA b Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14653, USA

Address correspondence to S. E. Hill. E-mail: sehill{at}mail.utexas.edu.

We propose a new, evolutionary, game-theoretic model of conditional human mating strategies that integrates currently disconnected bodies of data into a single mathematically-explicit theory of human mating transactions. The model focuses on the problem of how much resource a male must provide to a female to secure and retain her as a mate. By using bidding-game models, we show how the male's minimally required resource incentive varies as a function of his own mate value, the value of the female, and the distribution of the mate values of their available alternative mates. The resulting theory parsimoniously accounts for strategic pluralism within the sexes, mate choice differences between the sexes, and assortative mating, while generating a rich set of testable new predictions about human mating behavior.

Key words: assortative mating, evolution, game theory, human mating, mate choice, mating strategies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. E. Hill and K. M. Durante
Do Women Feel Worse to Look Their Best? Testing the Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Fertility Status Across the Menstrual Cycle
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2009; 35(12): 1592 - 1601.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.