Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on August 11, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):15-19; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh128
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/15    most recent
arh128v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapuisat, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chapuisat, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 1 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2005; all rights reserved.

Nestmate recognition in the unicolonial ant Formica paralugubris

Michel Chapuisat, Christian Bernasconi, Sophie Hoehn and Max Reuter

Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biology Building, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

Address correspondence to M. Chapuisat. E-mail: michel.chapuisat{at}unil.ch.

In unicolonial populations of ants, individuals can mix freely within large networks of nests that contain many queens. It has been proposed that the absence of aggression in unicolonial populations stems from a loss of nest mate recognition, but few studies have tested this hypothesis. We investigated patterns of aggression and nest mate recognition in the unicolonial wood ant, Formica paralugubris. Little aggression occurred, even between workers from nests separated by up to 5 km. However, when aggression took place, it was directed toward non–nest mates rather than nest mates. Trophallaxis (exchange of liquid food) occurred very frequently, and surprisingly, workers performed significantly more trophallaxis with non–nest mates than with nest mates (bias 2.4:1). Hence, workers are able to discriminate nest mates from non–nest mates. Higher rates of trophallaxis between non–nest mates may serve to homogenize the colony odor or may be an appeasement mechanism. Trophallaxis rate and aggression level were not correlated with geographical distance and did not differ within and between two populations separated by several kilometers. Hence, these populations do not represent differentiated supercolonies with clear-cut behavioral boundaries. Overall, the data demonstrate that unicoloniality can evolve despite well-developed nest mate recognition. Reduced levels of aggression might have been favored by the low rate of interactions with foreign workers, high cost of erroneously rejecting nest mates, and low cost of accepting foreign workers.

Key words: aggression, discrimination, kin recognition, unicoloniality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. Sorvari, P. Theodora, S. Turillazzi, H. Hakkarainen, and L. Sundstrom
Food resources, chemical signaling, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica aquilonia
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 441 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.