Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 14, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):25-29; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh130
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specific color sensitivities of prey and predator explain camouflage in different visual systems
aMuséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département d'Ecologie et de Gestion de la Biodiversité, CNRS UMR 5176, 91800 Brunoy, France, and bInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, Université de Tours, CNRS UMR 6035, F-37200 Tours, France
Address correspondence to M. Théry. E-mail: thery{at}mnhn.fr.
In situations of aggressive mimicry, predators adapt their color to that of the substrate on which they sit for hunting, a behavior that is presumed to hide them from prey as well as from their own predators. Females of few crab-spider species encounter such situations when lying on flowers to ambush pollinators. To evaluate the efficiency of spider camouflage on flowers, we measured by spectroradiometry adult female Thomisus onustus and marguerite daisies, Leucanthemum vulgare. We compared chromatic contrast (color used for short-range detection) of each pair of spider and flower to detection thresholds computed in the visual systems of both Hymenopteran prey and passerine bird predator. We also computed achromatic contrast (brightness) used for long-range detection. In both visual systems, each individual spider was efficiently matching the precise color of the flower center on which it was hunting. Being significantly darker than flowers, crab-spiders could in theory be detected at long range by either predator or prey using achromatic contrast. However, long-range detection is unlikely, owing to small spider size. Spiders also generated significant chromatic and achromatic contrasts to both Hymenoptera and bird when moving on flower periphery. Our study is the first to identify which photoreceptors of both prey and predator are involved in camouflage. The analysis suggests more research on bird predation and vision to determine to which extent bird predators effectively constrain spider crypsis.
Key words: bird, camouflage, crab-spider, Hymenoptera, spectrometry.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. J. Tan and D. Li Detritus decorations of an orb-weaving spider, Cyclosa mulmeinensis (Thorell): for food or camouflage? J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1832 - 1839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. L Cheney, C. Skogh, N. S Hart, and N. J. Marshall Mimicry, colour forms and spectral sensitivity of the bluestriped fangblenny, Plagiotremus rhinorhynchos Proc R Soc B, May 7, 2009; 276(1662): 1565 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. C Ioannou and J. Krause Interactions between background matching and motion during visual detection can explain why cryptic animals keep still Biol Lett, April 23, 2009; 5(2): 191 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Thery and J. Casas The multiple disguises of spiders: web colour and decorations, body colour and movement Phil Trans R Soc B, February 27, 2009; 364(1516): 471 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Stobbe, M. Dimitrova, S. Merilaita, and H. M. Schaefer Chromaticity in the UV/blue range facilitates the search for achromatically background-matching prey in birds Phil Trans R Soc B, February 27, 2009; 364(1516): 511 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Stobbe and H. M. Schaefer Enhancement of chromatic contrast increases predation risk for striped butterflies Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2008; 275(1642): 1535 - 1541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Thery, S. Pincebourde, and F. Feer Dusk light environment optimizes visual perception of conspecifics in a crepuscular horned beetle Behav. Ecol., March 4, 2008; (2008) arn024v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. C. Insausti and J. Casas The functional morphology of color changing in a spider: development of ommochrome pigment granules J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 780 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Loyau, D. Gomez, B. Moureau, M. Thery, N. S. Hart, M. S. Jalme, A. T.D. Bennett, and G. Sorci Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2007; 18(6): 1123 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M. Schaefer and N. Stobbe Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2006; 273(1600): 2427 - 2432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M. Schaefer, D. J. Levey, V. Schaefer, and M. L. Avery The role of chromatic and achromatic signals for fruit detection by birds Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 784 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Dreiss, M. Richard, F. Moyen, J. White, A.P. Moller, and E. Danchin Sex ratio and male sexual characters in a population of blue tits, Parus caeruleus Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Heiling, K. Cheng, L. Chittka, A. Goeth, and M. E. Herberstein The role of UV in crab spider signals: effects on perception by prey and predators J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2005; 208(20): 3925 - 3931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J Bruce, A. M Heiling, and M. E Herberstein Spider signals: are web decorations visible to birds and bees? Biol Lett, September 22, 2005; 1(3): 299 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Heiling, L. Chittka, K. Cheng, and M. E. Herberstein Colouration in crab spiders: substrate choice and prey attraction J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): 1785 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|