Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on August 5, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):269-273; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh152
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/269    most recent
arh152v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 1 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2005; all rights reserved.

Cohabitation of juvenile females with mature males promotes sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders

J. Chadwick Johnson

T.H. Morgan School of Biological Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506–0225, USA

Address correspondence to J.C. Johnson, who is now at University of Toronto @ Scarborough, Division of Life Sciences, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario, M1C 1A4 Canada. E-mail: jcjohnson{at}utsc.utoronto.ca.

Precopulatory sexual cannibalism, or female predation of a potential mate before mating, illustrates an extreme intersexual conflict. Unlike sexual cannibalism occurring after mating, precopulatory sexual cannibalism cannot be construed as a male strategy. Thus, research on the adaptive significance of this phenomenon has focused on female benefits. In the present study, I test the idea that precopulatory sexual cannibalism represents an adaptive female trade-off between the material costs and benefits of mating with a male (forgoing food, securing sperm) and preying on a male (forgoing sperm, securing food). I pay particular attention to the rarely tested prediction that precopulatory sexual cannibalism by virgin females should increase as each female's expectation of future mating opportunities increases. I use the phenomenon of cohabitation between adult males and juvenile females nearing sexual maturity as a means to manipulate female expectation of future mate availability. Results indicate that feeding on a male has significant positive effects on several measures of female fecundity. However, the likelihood of precopulatory attacks was not explained by a female's recent feeding history. Finally, as predicted, juvenile female cohabitation with mature males (expectation of future mating opportunities) heightens the prevalence of precopulatory attacks by virgin females, suggesting that juvenile experience can alter a female's propensity for sexual cannibalism. This is the first study to suggest that juvenile experience can alter a female's propensity for sexual cannibalism. This finding emphasizes the point that studies of sexual selection and mating systems need to consider the effects of juvenile experience on adult behavior.

Key words: adaptive foraging, fishing spiders, juvenile experience, male-female cohabitation, precopulatory sexual cannibalism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. L. Barry, G. I. Holwell, and M. E. Herberstein
Female praying mantids use sexual cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2008; 19(4): 710 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
E. A. Hebets and C. J. Vink
Experience leads to preference: experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2007; 18(6): 1010 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.