Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):62-69; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh123
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/62    most recent
arh123v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutstein, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Graves, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rutstein, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Graves, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 1 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2005; all rights reserved.

Sex-specific patterns of yolk androgen allocation depend on maternal diet in the zebra finch

Alison N. Rutstein, Lucy Gilbert, Peter J. B. Slater and Jeff A. Graves

School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TS, UK

Address correspondence to A. Rutstein. E-mail: ar27{at}st-andrews.ac.uk.

Females are predicted to adjust their reproductive investment in relation to resource quality. In zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), diet quality has been found to influence egg mass both between and within clutches. We tested the prediction that diet quality also affects the quantity of maternally allocated yolk testosterone and 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) between and within clutches. We also investigated whether this pattern differed between male and female eggs. Females laid eggs on a high-quality (HQ) or a low-quality (LQ) diet. Eggs were removed at laying and artificially incubated for 72 h, after which time embryos were sexed and yolk androgens assayed. Diet treatments were then swapped and the experiment repeated. Because there was evidence of a carry-over effect between breeding rounds, we based our conclusions mainly on the results from the first breeding round. On the HQ diet, but not on the LQ diet, infertile eggs contained more testosterone than did fertile eggs in round one. Although there were no overall differences in within-clutch patterns of androgen deposition between the diets, this changed when embryo sex was taken into account. On the HQ diet, testosterone decreased with laying sequence for male eggs but increased with laying sequence for female eggs. On the LQ diet, mothers' male eggs contained more testosterone and DHT than did female eggs regardless of position in the laying sequence. Our data suggest that there are complex, context-dependent mechanisms of sex-specific androgen allocation in this species.

Key words: diet quality, sex allocation, Taeniopygia guttata, yolk androgens, zebra finch.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. N. Rutstein, L. Gilbert, and J. L. Tomkins
Experience counts: lessons from studies of differential allocation
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 957 - 960.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A.N. Rutstein, H.E. Gorman, K.E. Arnold, L. Gilbert, K.J. Orr, A. Adam, R. Nager, and J.A. Graves
Sex allocation in response to paternal attractiveness in the zebra finch
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 763 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.