Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on August 18, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):70-74; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh132
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/70    most recent
arh132v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindström, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pampoulie, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lindström, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pampoulie, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 1 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2005; all rights reserved.

Effects of resource holding potential and resource value on tenure at nest sites in sand gobies

Kai Lindströma and Christophe Pampouliea,b

a Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 65, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland, and b Marine Research Institute, Division of Population Genetics, c\o Biotechnology House, Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavík, Iceland

Address correspondence to K. Lindström. E-mail: kai.lindstrom{at}helsinki.fi.

Over a broad range of animal systems, male reproductive success depends on resource holding potential (RHP) and resource quality. In a field study, we randomly combined males of different sizes with nests of different sizes to investigate the relative role of resource holding potential and resource quality in determining a sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus, male's nest tenure. Individually marked small and large males were given either small or large flowerpots for nests in isolation and were exposed to intruders after they had built nests. We found that nest tenure was longer for big males and owners of big nests. In most cases (34 of 51) the original nest owner was replaced by a bigger male. These replacements by larger males were probably due to takeovers by stronger intruders. Replacement males were larger at big nests. Our results support resource defense theory, as individuals with higher RHP and more valuable resources defended their nest for longer. On nine occasions males abandoned their nests. Owners of these nests were larger than the nest owners that were replaced. Hence, our results may provide an example of a situation in which sand goby males are able to judge the reproductive value of their current situation and act accordingly.

Key words: male competition, resource holding potential, resource quality, sand goby, take over.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
T. K. Lehtonen, S. Rintakoski, and K. Lindstrom
Mate preference for multiple cues: interplay between male and nest size in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 696 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.