Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 21, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):83-88; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh134
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/83    most recent
arh134v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clement, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fernald, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clement, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fernald, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 1 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2005; all rights reserved.

Female affiliative preference depends on reproductive state in the African cichlid fish, Astatotilapia burtoni

Tricia S. Clement, Kerry E. Grens and Russell D. Fernald

Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

Address correspondence to T. S. Clement. E-mail: triciac{at}psych.stanford.edu.

Hormones play a pivotal role in reproductive behavior and have been implicated in mediating mate choice decisions. Here we asked whether the differences in female reproductive state dependent on changes in hormone levels correspond to changes in female affiliation with males. In the African cichlid fish, Astatotilapia burtoni, males shift between reproductive (territorial; T) and non-reproductive (non-territorial; NT) states depending on social context while females alternate between gravid (egg bearing; G) and non-gravid (NG) reproductive states independent of social conditions. Moreover, the brain-pituitary-gonadal axis controlling reproduction and reproductive hormones is substantially remodeled in both males and females depending on reproductive state. To measure affiliative preference, gravid and non-gravid females were given the choice of associating with T or NT males. Gravid females preferentially associated with T males, whereas non-gravid females showed no preference. To discover whether gravid females use male size independent of dominance status as a cue for their choice, gravid females were given a choice between territorial males of different sizes. Gravid females preferred the smaller of two T males, but the smaller T males were significantly more active. Our results show that associative change could be an important behavioral mediator between hormonal cues and reproductive success, and that females use a hierarchy of cues in decision-making, preferring to affiliate with T over NT males and, among T males, preferring more active animals.

Key words: cichlid, mate choice, reproductive behavior, social status, visual preference.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. C. P. Renn, J. B. Carleton, H. Magee, M. L. T. Nguyen, and A. C. W. Tanner
Maternal care and altered social phenotype in a recently collected stock of Astatotilapia burtoni cichlid fish
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 49(6): 660 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. J. Leary
Hormones and acoustic communication in anuran amphibians
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2009; 49(4): 452 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. K. Desjardins and R. D. Fernald
How do social dominance and social information influence reproduction and the brain?
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 48(5): 596 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.