Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on January 19, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(2):488-496; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Address correspondence to S.C. Pratt. E-mail: spratt{at}princeton.edu.
Emigrating colonies of the ant Temnothorax (formerly Leptothorax) albipennis can choose the best of several nest sites, even when the active ants organizing the move do not compare sites. This collective ability depends on a quorum rule used by ants assessing a candidate site. Only when the site's population has surpassed a threshold do they switch from slow recruitment of fellow active ants by tandem runs to rapid transport of the majority of the colony. Here, I show that ants perceive the achievement of a quorum through their rate of direct encounters with nest mates at the site. When ants in a crowded site were prevented from tactile contact with nest mates, they recruited by tandem runs, as though to an empty nest. Furthermore, when the encounter rate was raised independent of population, by reducing the size of the candidate nest, ants started to transport at a significantly lower population. The switch occurred at the same encounter rate regardless of nest size, whether the rate was measured as the mean over the entire visit or as the inverse of the latency until the first encounter. Because encounter rate reflects the density of nest mates and thus varies with nest size as well as population, the ants' collective decision-making algorithm may be robust to the exact population at which the switch to transport occurs. Ants cease monitoring quorum presence after switching to transport, coincident with an abrupt shortening of visit duration by approximately 2 min, which may be interpreted as the time required for quorum detection.
Key words: ants, collective decision making, nest-site selection, quorum sensing, Temothorax albipemis.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Garnier, J. Gautrais, M. Asadpour, C. Jost, and G. Theraulaz Self-Organized Aggregation Triggers Collective Decision Making in a Group of Cockroach-Like Robots Adaptive Behavior, April 1, 2009; 17(2): 109 - 133. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. R Franks, F.-X. Dechaume-Moncharmont, E. Hanmore, and J. K Reynolds Speed versus accuracy in decision-making ants: expediting politics and policy implementation Phil Trans R Soc B, March 27, 2009; 364(1518): 845 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Gordon, S. Holmes, and S. Nacu The short-term regulation of foraging in harvester ants Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 217 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. C. Pratt and D. J. T. Sumpter A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making PNAS, October 24, 2006; 103(43): 15906 - 15910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.J.T Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour Phil Trans R Soc B, January 29, 2006; 361(1465): 5 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|