Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on April 13, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(4):747-754; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/747    most recent
ari048v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johannessen, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lifjeld, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johannessen, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lifjeld, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Manipulation of male quality in wild tits: effects on paternity loss

Lars Erik Johannessena, Tore Slagsvolda, Bo Terning Hansena and Jan T. Lifjeldb

a Program for Experimental Behavioral and Population Ecological Research (EBE), Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway, and b Zoological Museum, Natural History Museums and Botanical Garden, University of Oslo, Norway

Address correspondence to L.E. Johannessen. E-mail: l.e.johannessen{at}bio.uio.no.

Extrapair paternity (EPP) has proved to be widespread and highly variable among birds and other taxa, including socially monogamous species. A multitude of hypotheses have been put forward to explain this variation, but its occurrence is not fully understood. Male age, social dominance rank, song and breeding density or synchrony have been among the suggested correlates of EPP, but results so far are inconclusive. We interspecifically cross-fostered blue tits (Parus caeruleus) and great tits (Parus major) in the wild, thus manipulating males to exhibit reduced social dominance rank, sing aberrant songs, and consequently be perceived as low-quality males as compared to controls. This allowed us to test if male quality had an influence on loss of paternity. We found no statistically significant differences between cross-fostered and control males of either species, neither with respect to levels of cuckoldry nor proportions of extrapair young (EPY) in the broods. Paternity levels were comparable to other studies on the same species. No effect of density could be detected on levels of EPP either, while an age effect seemed to be present at least in the blue tit, EPY being almost absent in broods of older blue tit males. We conclude that the effects of male quality on paternity loss are minor, if any, in these populations.

Key words: cross-fostering, early learning, extrapair paternity, microsatellite, sexual imprinting, social rearing conditions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.