Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on May 25, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(4):763-769; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/763    most recent
ari052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutstein, A.N.
Right arrow Articles by Graves, J.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rutstein, A.N.
Right arrow Articles by Graves, J.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Sex allocation in response to paternal attractiveness in the zebra finch

A.N. Rutsteina, H.E. Gormanb, K.E. Arnoldb, L. Gilberta, K.J. Orrb, A. Adamb, R. Nagerb and J.A. Gravesa

a School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK, and b Department of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Address correspondence to A.N. Rutstein, who is now at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia. E-mail: a.rutstein{at}unsw.edu.au.

Females mated to attractive males are predicted to produce male-biased broods. Previous studies on zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in which colored leg rings were used to alter male attractiveness, support this hypothesis. However, because molecular sexing techniques were not available, it was not known when during development this bias arose. Also, because both attractive (red-ringed) and unattractive (green-ringed) males were within the same aviary, assortative mating between treatments may have confounded the results. Using two different experimental designs, we tested whether the sex ratio of zebra finch eggs and chicks differed in response to paternal ring color whilst controlling for assortative mating between treatments. In the aviary experiment, birds could interact socially, but all males in an aviary had the same leg ring color. In the cage experiment, each female was randomly assigned a red- or green-ringed mate, thus also eliminating assortative mating within treatments. Offspring were sexed based on plumage or using a molecular method. The sex ratio at laying did not differ between treatments in either the aviary (n = 313 eggs) or cage (n = 151 eggs) experiments, suggesting that female zebra finches do not manipulate the primary sex ratio in response to their mate's ring color. However, in the cage experiment we found greater male embryonic mortality in the attractive group, which resulted in a female-biased sex ratio at sexual maturity, that is, in the opposite direction to that found in previous studies. Possible explanations for the disparity between our results and those of previous studies are considered.

Key words: attractiveness, differential mortality, sex ratio, Taeniopygia guttata, zebra finch.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. W. Fawcett, B. Kuijper, I. Pen, and F. J. Weissing
Should attractive males have more sons?
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.