Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on September 29, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(6):1042-1048; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari085
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The importance of sperm competition risk and nest appearance for male behavior and female choice in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
Address correspondence to O. Svensson, who is now at the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK. E-mail: o.svensson{at}hull.ac.uk.
To test if an increased sperm competition risk affects male behavior and mating decisions of both sexes, we performed two experiments using the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus, a nest-building fish with exclusive paternal care. In our first experiment, a nest-holding male, with a confined female, was sequentially exposed to a vial with a sneaker male or an empty vial. While male courtship, nest building, displacement fanning, and time outside the nest were unaffected, individual males showed a higher mucus preparation effort inside the nest in the presence of a sneaker male than when alone. We found such mucus to contain sperm, thus clearly suggesting an importance in sperm competition. In our second experiment, a female was free to spawn with two different males, one of which was exposed to a confined sneaker male. Male mating success was not affected by the presence of a sneaker male. However, the volume of sand the male had put on his nest was positively associated with female spawning decision, while nest-opening width was not. In a partial correlation of five traits thought to attract females (nest-opening width, sand volume, male courtship display, displacement fanning, and male size), males that fanned well were found to also build large nests or display intensely, but not both. This indicates that rather than being jacks-of-all-trades, individual males focus on a subset of traits for attracting females.
Key words: alternative reproductive tactics, courtship, mating decisions, signal honesty, sperm competition, sperm trail.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. K. Lehtonen and B. B.M. Wong Should females prefer males with elaborate nests? Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1015 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Lehtonen and K. Lindstrom Females decide whether size matters: plastic mate preferences tuned to the intensity of male-male competition Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 195 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Lehtonen, S. Rintakoski, and K. Lindstrom Mate preference for multiple cues: interplay between male and nest size in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 696 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Svensson and C. Kvarnemo Parasitic spawning in sand gobies: an experimental assessment of nest-opening size, sneaker male cues, paternity, and filial cannibalism Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 410 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kvarnemo Evolution and maintenance of male care: is increased paternity a neglected benefit of care? Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 144 - 148. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
