Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on November 9, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(1):84-87; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Great tits (Parus major) searching for artificial prey: implications for cryptic coloration and symmetry
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Address correspondence to S. Merilaita. E-mail: sami.merilaita{at}zoologi.su.se. J. Lind is now at the School of Biology, Bute Building, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK.
It has been suggested that bilateral symmetry may impose a cost for animals relying on camouflage because symmetric color patterns might increase the risk of detection. We tested the effect of symmetry on crypsis, carrying out a predation experiment with great tits (Parus major) and black-and-whitepatterned, artificial prey items and background. First, we found that detection time was significantly longer for a highly cryptic, asymmetric pattern based on a random sample of the background than for its symmetric variants. Second, we were able to arrange the elements of a prey pattern in a way that the resulting asymmetric pattern was highly cryptic and, furthermore, its symmetric variant was highly cryptic as well. We conclude that symmetry may impose a substantial cost on cryptic patterns, but this cost varies among patterns. This suggests that for prey, which predators typically view from an angle exposing their symmetry, selection for pattern asymmetry may be less important and selection for decreased detectability cost of symmetry may be more important than previously thought. This may help to understand the existence of so many prey with cryptic, symmetric color patterns.
Key words: background matching, crypsis, disruptive coloration, predation, symmetry.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Stevens and S. Merilaita Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions Phil Trans R Soc B, February 27, 2009; 364(1516): 481 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stevens, S. A. Castor-Perry, and J. R.F. Price The protective value of conspicuous signals is not impaired by shape, size, or position asymmetry Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 96 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stevens Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration Proc R Soc B, June 22, 2007; 274(1617): 1457 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Merilaita Artificial neural networks and the study of evolution of prey coloration Phil Trans R Soc B, March 29, 2007; 362(1479): 421 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Schaefer and N. Stobbe Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2006; 273(1600): 2427 - 2432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stevens, I. C Cuthill, A. M.M Windsor, and H. J Walker Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2006; 273(1600): 2433 - 2438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Cuthill, M. Stevens, A. M.M. Windsor, and H. J. Walker The effects of pattern symmetry on detection of disruptive and background-matching coloration Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 828 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


