Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 15, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(2):270-276; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/270    most recent
arj025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Low, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Low, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The energetic cost of mate guarding is correlated with territorial intrusions in the New Zealand stitchbird

Matthew Low

Ecology Group, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Address correspondence to M. Low, who is now at the Australian Antarctic Division, Southern Ocean Ecosystem Program, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston 7050, Tasmania, Australia. E-mail: matt.low{at}aad.gov.au.

Male stitchbirds (hihi) Notiomystis cincta attempt to minimize paternity losses by engaging in intense mate guarding centered on the fertile period of their social mate. While this strategy is directed at preventing intruding extrapair males from successfully achieving forced copulation with their female, it is likely to be energetically costly because of the large amount of time spent chasing intruders. In this study, I measured the energetic cost of mate guarding by recording the daily body weight of 28 breeding male stitchbirds during first clutch attempts and used a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to assess the relationship between their weight fluctuations and (1) measures of mate-guarding intensity, (2) the total duration of extrapair male intrusions into their territory, (3) the age of the focal male, (4) the local population density, and (5) proximity to supplementary food. The CART model divided resident males into two groups based on the level of intrusions by extrapair males. For the low-intruder group, resident males maintained a stable weight during their female's fertile period, whereas, for the high-intruder group, males lost an average 4.3% of their body weight, with their weights reaching a minimum on days –1 and 0 relative to the date of first egg lay. This pattern of weight loss mirrored the pattern of extrapair territorial intrusions into the focal male's territory. While the costs of harassment associated with forced extrapair copulation have previously focused on females, this study shows that these costs can also be significant for the resident male.

Key words: body weight, energetic cost, forced copulation, mate guarding, reproductive cost, sexual conflict, sperm competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
F. Helfenstein, S. Losdat, V. Saladin, and H. Richner
Females of carotenoid-supplemented males are more faithful and produce higher quality offspring
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1165 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M.C Bel-Venner, S Dray, D Allaine, F Menu, and S Venner
Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider
Proc R Soc B, January 7, 2008; 275(1630): 77 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.