Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on January 18, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(3):336-344; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/336    most recent
arj036v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dornhaus, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chittka, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dornhaus, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chittka, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2006.

Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model

Anna Dornhausa, Franziska Klüglb, Christoph Oechsleinb, Frank Puppeb and Lars Chittkac

a Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, 1041 E. Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, b Department of Artificial Intelligence and Applied Computing, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany, and c School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary College, London, E1 4NS, U.K

Address correspondence to A. Dornhaus. E-mail: dornhaus{at}email.arizona.edu.

Why do some social insects have sophisticated recruitment systems, while other species do not communicate about food source locations at all? To answer this question, it is necessary to identify the social or ecological factors that make recruitment adaptive and thus likely to evolve. We developed an individual-based model of honey bee foraging to quantify the benefits of recruitment under different spatial distributions of nondepleting resource patches and with different colony sizes. Benefits of recruitment were strongly dependent on resource patch quality, density, and variability. Communication was especially beneficial if patches were poor, few, and variable. A sensitivity analysis of the model showed that under conditions of high resource density recruitment could even become detrimental, especially if foraging duration was short, tendency to scout was high, or recruits needed a long time to find communicated locations. Colony size, a factor often suspected to influence recruitment evolution, had no significant effect. These results may explain the recent experimental findings that in honey bees, benefits of waggle dance recruitment seem to vary seasonally and with habitat. They may also explain why some, but not other, species of social bees have evolved a strategy to communicate food locations to nest mates.

Key words: Apis mellifera, communication, foraging, individual-based model, social insects, waggle dance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. Beekman and J. B. Lew
Foraging in honeybees--when does it pay to dance?
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 255 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.