Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on March 17, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(3):491-496; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj057
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/491    most recent
arj057v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Host-parasite relatedness in wood ducks: patterns of kinship and parasite success

Charlotte Roy Nielsena, Brad Semelb, Paul W. Shermanc, David F. Westneatd and Patricia G. Parkera

a Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St Louis, MO 63121, USA, b Illinois Department of Natural Resources, 8916 Wilmot Road, Spring Grove, IL 60081, USA, c Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Mudd Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA, and d Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, 101 Morgan Building, Lexington, KY 40506, USA

Address correspondence to C. Roy Nielsen who is now at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Mailcode 6504, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA. E-mail: clroy_50{at}yahoo.com.

We investigated the role of kinship in intraspecific nest parasitism of wood ducks (Aix sponsa). Among waterfowl, female philopatry creates the potential for female relatives to nest in proximity. Costs of intraspecific nest parasitism to host females may be reduced if parasites lay eggs with kin. However, previous observations of marked wood ducks indicated that females avoided parasitizing clutch mates or the female that incubated them. To further examine the role of kinship, we determined the genotypes of 27 host-parasite pairs at five microsatellite loci. Average relatedness between hosts and all females laying parasitic eggs was only 0.04 ± 0.03. Parasites appeared to choose hosts randomly with respect to kinship from among females with nests in the neighborhood and those within the entire study area. However, host relatedness to the parasite with the greatest number of young leaving the nest was 0.11 ± 0.03, which was greater than expected if eggs were accepted randomly from neighboring females or from females present on the entire study area (p = .03 and p = .02, respectively). These patterns may reflect parasitism of randomly selected nests followed by differential acceptance by hosts, differential hatching success of related parasites (e.g., due to greater laying synchrony), or a mixture of parasitic strategies, one with a focus on related hosts and the other on unrelated hosts. Genetic data revealed that social relationships did not always reflect true relatedness and that success of primary parasites was associated with kinship to hosts.

Key words: Aix sponsa, intraspecific nest parasitism, kin selection, microsatellites, relatedness, wood ducks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. Waldeck, M. Andersson, M. Kilpi, and M. Ost
Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.