Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on March 8, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(3):503-509; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj055
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/503    most recent
arj055v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nystrand, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nystrand, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Influence of age, kinship, and large-scale habitat quality on local foraging choices of Siberian jays

Magdalena Nystrand

Population Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18 D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden

Address correspondence to M. Nystrand. E-mail: magdalena.nystrand{at}ebc.uu.se.

Animals face a constant conflict between gaining benefits and the risks associated with achieving them. In particular, the trade-off between gaining food and avoiding predation has been the subject of much attention. Here, I investigate the preferences for foraging sites in the group-living Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus), focusing on how energy intake is traded against proximity to cover. The main predator of this species relies primarily on visual cues to locate its prey, and thus, foraging in open habitat should be associated with higher exposure to a predator. Jays generally chose to feed in cover, a pattern that became stronger toward late winter. In particular, the strength of this preference varied with age, relatedness to other group members, and large-scale habitat quality. Adult territory holders and their retained offspring demonstrated similar preference for cover over seasons, a pattern not observed in nonrelated immigrants that showed no response to either forest structure or season. These results suggest that the benefits of parental nepotism enables retained offspring to take less risk, in regards to predators while foraging compared to similar-aged immigrants whose foraging options are constrained by social interference. Also, this study indicates that large-scale forest structure influences small-scale individual behavioral decisions.

Key words: feeding site, predation, relatedness, Siberian jay, social groups.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A. J. King, N. J.B. Isaac, and G. Cowlishaw
Ecological, social, and reproductive factors shape producer-scrounger dynamics in baboons
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1039 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. Griesser and M. Nystrand
Vigilance and predation of a forest-living bird species depend on large-scale habitat structure
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2009; 20(4): 709 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. Griesser, M. Nystrand, S. Eggers, and J. Ekman
Social constraints limit dispersal and settlement decisions in a group-living bird species
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 317 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Griesser, M. Nystrand, and J. Ekman
Reduced mortality selects for family cohesion in a social species
Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2006; 273(1596): 1881 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.