Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on April 28, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(4):591-596; doi:10.1093/beheco/ark004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of the nutritional environment and reproductive investment on herbivoreparasite interactions in grazing environments
a Animal Nutrition and Health, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, United Kingdom and b Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
Address correspondence to M.R. Hutchings. E-mail: mike.hutchings{at}sac.ac.uk
Parasitism is a serious challenge to herbivore health and fitness. To avoid parasites, herbivores avoid grazing near feces, creating a mosaic of contaminated tall avoided areas (tussocks) and noncontaminated short grazed areas (gaps). The mosaic represents a nutrition versus parasitism trade-off in that feces-contaminated tussocks are localized concentrations of both forage resources and parasites. Here, we use a grazing experiment with a natural tussockgap mosaic to determine how the nutritional environment and reproductive effort affect sheep grazing decisions when faced with this trade-off. There were 3 animal treatments (Barren ewes, ewes suckling a single lamb, and ewes suckling twin lambs) and 2 environment treatments (low and high nitrogen). Sward selection and grazing behavior were measured using focal observations on grazing ewes. Sheep showed an overall strong and significant avoidance of tussocks across all treatments. However, there was a reduction in the avoidance of tussocks by ewes on the low-nitrogen (low-N) plots. Ewes suckling twins showed a reduced avoidance of tussocks compared with barren ewes. Lactating ewes in low-N environments further reduced their avoidance of tussocks. Ewes with twins, which are at greatest risk from parasites, had the greatest contact with feces and thus parasites, especially in low-N environments. We conclude that twin-bearing ewes accept the increased risk of parasitism in order to gain the nutrients required to support increased reproductive effort, thus increasing their investment in current offspring at the cost of increased risk of parasitism and thus future potential reproductive attempts.
Key words: feces avoidance, fitness, grazing, maternal investment, parasite risk.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. W. Garnick, M. A. Elgar, I. Beveridge, and G. Coulson Foraging efficiency and parasite risk in eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) Behav. Ecol., November 25, 2009; (2009) arp162v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Miller Seasonal effects on offspring reproductive traits through maternal oviposition behavior Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1297 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Rogerson, W. S. Fairbanks, and L. Cornicelli ECOLOGY OF GASTROPOD AND BIGHORN SHEEP HOSTS OF LUNGWORM ON ISOLATED, SEMIARID MOUNTAIN RANGES IN UTAH, USA J. Wildl. Dis., January 1, 2008; 44(1): 28 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

