Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on May 5, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(4):614-621; doi:10.1093/beheco/ark002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/4/614    most recent
ark002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKinnon, L.
Right arrow Articles by Scribner, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McKinnon, L.
Right arrow Articles by Scribner, K. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in common eiders (Somateria mollissima)

Laura McKinnona, H. Grant Gilchristb and Kim T. Scribnera,c

a Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI 48824-1222, USA, b Canadian Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Centre, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Raven Road, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3, Canada, and c Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI 48824-1222, USA

Address correspondence to L. McKinnon. E-mail: mckinn98{at}msu.edu.

Kin-based social groups are commonly studied among cooperatively breeding species but have been less studied in "nontraditional" group breeding systems. We investigated the presence of kin-based sociality among females in the common eider (Somateria mollisima), a colonial nesting sea duck that exhibits high levels of natal philopatry in females. Previous studies of female sociality in common eiders have been restricted to observations during brood rearing. However, aggregations of female common eiders are also observed during other periods of the life cycle such as colony arrival and nesting. Here we apply a novel, empirical framework using molecular markers and field sampling to genetically characterize female social groups at several stages of the common eider life cycle. When compared with mean estimates of interindividual relatedness for the entire colony, significantly higher levels of relatedness were found between females within groups arriving to the colony in flight, between females and nearest neighbors at the time of nest site selection, and between groups of females departing the colony with ducklings. Both full-sibling and half-sibling equivalent relationships were also found within these groups. Therefore, throughout each of several stages including in-flight colony arrival, nesting, and brood rearing, we provide the first genetically confirmed evidence of female kin-based social groups in common eiders and anseriformes in general.

Key words: common eider, kin groups, microsatellites, relatedness, sociality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. Waldeck, M. Andersson, M. Kilpi, and M. Ost
Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.