Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on August 22, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(6):998-1003; doi:10.1093/beheco/arl032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/6/998    most recent
arl032v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, D.
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, D.
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Nonindependent mating in a coral reef damselfish: evidence of mate choice copying in the wild

Denis Goulet* and Tamar L. Goulet*

Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA

Address correspondence to D. Goulet. E-mail: dgoulet{at}olemiss.edu.

Theoretical and experimental studies have shown that mate choice copying is a viable mating strategy under certain conditions. Copying experiments in fish have been conducted primarily in the laboratory, except for one study conducted in the field under artificial conditions. We investigated whether in a wild population of the coral reef whitebelly damselfish (Amblyglyphidodon leucogaster) females copy the choice of other females. Females preferentially spawn with males that have recently mated. To determine if the presence of new eggs in the nest was the reason females chose mates or whether females were mate choice copying, we conducted egg-switching experiments. Eggs from males that recently mated were donated to males that had no eggs. If females are mate choice copying, then donor males with no eggs in the nest should continue to receive additional eggs. If females are using the presence of new eggs as the criterion for mate choice, then foster males with new eggs should receive additional eggs. We found that donor males received new eggs significantly more often than expected. More females mated with donor males than foster males. Furthermore, females preferentially chose to mate with males whom they had seen mating with another female. Females appear to remember the mate choice of other females and choose to mate with those same males even after 1 day. These results suggest that females may be copying the mating decision of other females rather than choosing males based on the presence of new eggs in the nest.

Key words: copying, damselfish, female mate choice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.