Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on November 21, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(1):236-240; doi:10.1093/beheco/arl079
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consequences of complex signaling: predator detection of multimodal cues
a Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University at Newark, Newark, OH 43055, USA b Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia c Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
Address correspondence to J.A. Roberts. E-mail: roberts.762{at}osu.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Animals often evolve complex signals to enhance their detectability by intended receivers. But signals that are more detectable by intended receivers may also be more likely to be intercepted by others, including predators. Courtship signaling in male Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders (Lycosidae) includes morphological traits (prominent foreleg tufts) and active behaviors that together produce a complex signal with simultaneous broadcast of visual and seismic components. Females respond more readily to males with large tufts and are more likely to respond when multiple modalities (visual and seismic) are present in a complex signal. These spiders cooccur with active predators that may intercept these conspicuous courtship signals and use them as hunting cues. We used video/seismic playback to experimentally isolate and manipulate aspects of the complex signal produced by male S. ocreata. We found that increasing the size of a visual signal (male tufts) and increasing the complexity of the courtship signal by adding a second modality (visual plus seismic versus visual alone) increased the speed with which a common predator, the jumping spider Phidippus clarus (Salticidae), responded to playbacks of courting male S. ocreata. These results indicate that the benefits of increased signaling efficacy of large visual signaling ornaments and complex, multimodal signaling may be countered by increased predation risks.
Key words: complex signals, Lycosidae, playback, predation, Salticidae, spider.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. J. Wilgers, A. C. Nicholas, D. H. Reed, G. E. Stratton, and E. A. Hebets Condition-dependent alternative mating tactics in a sexually cannibalistic wolf spider Behav. Ecol., June 22, 2009; (2009) arp078v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. L. Smith and C. S. Evans Silent tidbitting in male fowl, Gallus gallus: a referential visual signal with multiple functions J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2009; 212(6): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Hoefler, M. H. Persons, and A. L. Rypstra Evolutionarily costly courtship displays in a wolf spider: a test of viability indicator theory Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 974 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Smith and C. S. Evans Multimodal signaling in fowl, Gallus gallus J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2052 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. G Kulahci, A. Dornhaus, and D. R Papaj Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees Proc R Soc B, April 7, 2008; 275(1636): 797 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|