Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on October 3, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(1):97-102; doi:10.1093/beheco/arl056
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/1/97    most recent
arl056v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dor, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lotem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dor, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lotem, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Begging in the absence of parents: a "quick on the trigger" strategy to minimize costly misses

Roi Dora, Hilla Kedara, David W. Winklerb and Arnon Lotema

a Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Israel b Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

Address correspondence to R. Dor. E-mail: dorroi{at}post.tau.ac.il.


   Abstract

Nestling begging in the absence of parents may reflect "false alarms" due to cognitive constraints or signaling activity toward nest mates (sibling negotiation). According to signal detection theory, cognitive constraints should result in both false alarms (begging in the absence of parents or to inappropriate stimuli) and misses (failure to beg during parental visits). In our study of house sparrows, nestling begging in the absence of parents comprised up to 50% of the begging events at the nest and was more frequent at an early age and among hungrier (lower ranked) nestlings. In contrast, the probability of begging during parental visits was constantly high (80% or more), suggesting that the rate of misses must have been low even at an early age. These results have 2 main implications. First, the observation that begging in the absence of parents decreases with nestling age favors the cognitive constraints hypothesis over functional explanations such as the sibling negotiation hypothesis. Second, the low proportion of "misses" among young nestlings suggests that nestling respond to their cognitive constraints by using low decision criteria (a "quick on the trigger" strategy) that increases the frequency of false alarms but minimizes costly misses.

Key words: cognitive constraints, false alarm, nestling begging, Passer domesticus, signal detection theory.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
E. Bulmer, P. Celis, and D. Gil
Parent-absent begging: evidence for sibling honesty and cooperation in the spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor)
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
U. Grodzinski, I. Erev, and A. Lotem
Can hungry nestlings be trained to reduce their begging?
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 116 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
U. Grodzinski and A. Lotem
The adaptive value of parental responsiveness to nestling begging
Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2007; 274(1624): 2449 - 2456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.