Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 6, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(2):311-317; doi:10.1093/beheco/arl085
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/2/311    most recent
arl085v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooperman, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cooperman, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Different sexual traits show covariation among genotypes: implications for sexual selection

Alison F. Coopermana, Michal Polaka, Christopher S. Evansb and Phillip W. Taylorb

a Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0006, USA b Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Address correspondence to M. Polak. E-mail: polakm{at}email.uc.edu.


   Abstract

An unresolved question in sexual selection research is whether different secondary sexual traits are developmentally independent or instead whether their degree of expression is a manifestation of a general resource pool (i.e., condition) within the organism. If degree of expression of different sexual traits reflects ability to accumulate condition, then covariation should exist across genotypes in the expression of these traits, even if they are very different in kind. Here we present evidence for predicted covariation between morphological (sex comb size) and behavioral (courtship song) sexual traits among genetic lines of Drosophila bipectinata Duda extracted from a natural population. There is evidence that both these traits in Drosophila are condition dependent and subject to sexual selection. We detected significant body size–independent differences in comb size among 32 lines. Replicate lines exhibiting relatively high and low values of comb size were then subjected to analyses of courtship song. High sex comb lines exhibited shorter mean burst period and shorter mean burst duration than low sex comb lines. These song differences occurred only during the distant pursuit phase of male courtship and existed despite factoring out individual variations in sex comb size, the trait on the basis of which test lines were originally chosen. The results verify the prediction of an association between condition-dependent secondary sexual traits across genotypes and, therefore, support the existence of an overall genetic quality related to condition acquisition.

Key words: condition, courtship song, Drosophila bipectinata, genetic quality, secondary sexual traits, sex comb.

Received 17 February 2006; revised 3 November 2006; accepted 7 November 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. Polak and L. W. Simmons
Secondary sexual trait size reveals competitive fertilization success in Drosophila bipectinata Duda
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2009; 20(4): 753 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Polak and P. W Taylor
A primary role of developmental instability in sexual selection
Proc R Soc B, December 22, 2007; 274(1629): 3133 - 3140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.