Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on January 8, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(2):420-426; doi:10.1093/beheco/arl100
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/2/420    most recent
arl100v2
arl100v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szöllosi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Török, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Szöllosi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Török, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Is hatching asynchrony beneficial for the brood?

Eszter Szöllosi, Balázs Rosivall and János Török

Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, Budapest, Hungary

Address correspondence to E. Szöllosi. E-mail: sz_eszter{at}ludens.elte.hu.


   Abstract

Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain why female birds start to incubate before clutch completion (IBCC). Some of those suggest that the resulting hatching asynchrony (HA) is adaptive because it increases the size hierarchy among offspring and in turn reduces nestling competition and energy demands during the peak feeding period. Others argue that IBCC is a good strategy in unpredictable environments. When food conditions deteriorate, the large size hierarchy quickly results in the death of the last hatched nestlings, allowing the remaining ones to survive and fledge in better condition. In comparison, under favorable conditions, all nestlings can fledge independent of hatching order. To test these hypotheses, we performed a brood size manipulation experiment (as a simulation of good and bad years) in collared flycatchers Ficedula albicollis and examined the effect of size hierarchy on offspring and brood performance. We found that chicks with an initial size disadvantage experienced reduced body mass growth and had shorter feathers at fledging in both reduced and enlarged broods. In enlarged broods, they also fledged with a smaller skeletal size. Although broods on average or parents could possibly still benefit from HA when food is scarce, this was not seen in the current study. Parental survival was not related to the size hierarchy in the broods, and the average body mass growth of the nestlings was slower in broods with a high initial size variance. We therefore conclude that HA and the resulting size hierarchy are probably detrimental for the growth of nestlings in both good and bad years, at least in species where nestling mortality does not occur early in life.

Key words: collared flycatcher, fledging size, food supply, maternal effects, nestling growth, size hierarchy.

Received 21 August 2006; revised 28 November 2006; accepted 29 November 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.