Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(2):451-455; doi:10.1093/beheco/arl105
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interaction rate informs harvester ant task decisions
a Department of Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, PO Box 173364, CB 171, Denver, CO 80217, USA b Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA
Address correspondence to M.J. Greene. E-mail: michael.greene{at}cudenver.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Social insect colonies operate without central control, and colony organization results from the ways that individuals respond to local information. We investigated how temporal information, in particular the rate of interaction among workers, stimulates foraging activity in the red harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex barbatus). Patrollers scout the foraging area each morning. Previous work showed that the patrollers' safe return to the nest stimulates the foragers to leave the nest; if the patrollers do not return, the foragers do not emerge. Here, we tested whether contact with returning patrollers must occur at a particular rate to stimulate foraging. We varied the rates at which we introduced patroller mimics, glass beads coated with an extract of the cuticular hydrocarbons of patrollers. A return rate of 1 patroller mimic every 10 s stimulated the highest level of foraging activity. We found that the onset of foraging depends on the rate of patroller return. Adding beads coated with patroller hydrocarbons at a rate of 1 per 10 s caused otherwise undisturbed colonies to forage 17.9 ± 19.7 (standard deviation) min faster than colonies that received blank control beads. These results show that rate is a crucial source of information in the network of interactions among workers.
Key words: cuticular hydrocarbons, foraging behavior, interaction rate, social insects, task allocation.
Received 19 July 2006; revised 23 October 2006; accepted 14 December 2006.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. D. Beverly, H. McLendon, S. Nacu, S. Holmes, and D. M. Gordon How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 633 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Gordon, S. Holmes, and S. Nacu The short-term regulation of foraging in harvester ants Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 217 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|