Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on March 6, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(3):507-512; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/3/507    most recent
arm008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laiolo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Laiolo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Distress calls reflect poxvirus infection in lesser short-toed lark Calandrella rufescens

Paola Laioloa, David Serranoa, José L. Tellaa, Martina Carretea, Guillermo Lopeza and Carlos Navarrob

a Departamento de Biologia Aplicada, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Avenida Maria Luisa s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain b Departamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), E-04001 Almería, Spain

Address correspondence to P. Laiolo. E-mail: paola{at}ebd.csic.es.


   Abstract

Several studies have highlighted the association between bird song and parasite load, but there is no evidence regarding the relationships among pathogens and alarm or distress calls, which are used in antipredator strategies. We analyzed the association between virus infection and the distress calls of lesser short-toed lark (Calandrella rufescens), addressing the relationships between call acoustic properties, presence of poxvirus lesions, and other measurements of bird health (body condition, T-cell–mediated immune response, heterophils-to-lymphocytes ratio [H/L ratio], and blood parasites). The study was carried out in Fuerteventura (Canary Islands), where 55% of lesser short-toed larks were infected. Pox infection was associated with changes in the spectrotemporal structure of lark distress calls and affected the condition-dependent nature of these signals. Virus bearers uttered significantly shorter and lower pitched calls than virus-free birds, giving even shorter calls when subject to greater physiological stress (higher H/L ratio), whereas virus-free individuals did the opposite. Call harshness was positively correlated with bird immune and body condition, independently of virus infection, whereas call pulse rate decreased in stressed birds. We hypothesize that healthy birds might reveal their ability to bear the costs of antipredator defense by means of long, harsh, and fast modulated distress calls. Infection not only affects individual state and morphology by means of gross lesions but also may alter a signal used in an antipredator context, thus potentially reducing bird fitness both directly (through disease) and indirectly (through increased predation).

Key words: acoustic communication, H/L ratio, immune response, island, parasite, poxvirus, prey.

Received 1 September 2006; revised 14 November 2006; accepted 10 January 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.