Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on March 5, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(3):535-540; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/3/535    most recent
arm007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Billing, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Billing, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

No terminal investment in pipefish males: only young males exhibit risk-prone courtship behavior

Anna M. Billinga, Gunilla Rosenqvista and Anders Berglundb

a Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway b Department of Ecology and Evolution/Animal Ecology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18d, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden

Address correspondence to A.M. Billing. E-mail: anna.billing{at}bio.ntnu.no.


  Abstract

Animals are expected to trade-off current and future reproduction in order to maximize lifetime reproductive success. Old individuals may accept higher risks during courtship and mate choice as their residual reproductive value (RRV) diminishes (the terminal investment hypothesis). Alternatively, young individuals may be forced to take higher risks during courtship to compensate for their lower competitiveness and/or attractiveness (the compensation hypothesis). In this study, we used the sex-role reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle to test how mate choice and courtship behavior of males with different RRV were affected by an increase in predation risk. Males of different ages were given the opportunity to court and choose between 2 partners. In half of the trials, a predator was present in a separate aquarium. We found no support for the terminal investment hypothesis: no difference in response to the increased predation risk by males of different ages was evident. In agreement with the compensation hypothesis, young males invested more in courtship behavior compared with older males. In addition, in the absence of a predator, we found that a high female activity was important for male mate choice decisions. During increased predation risk, this relationship was, however, reversed and males preferred less active, and thus less conspicuous, partners. This suggests that both female activity and size are important factors for male mating decisions in this species and that these decisions mainly are affected by predation risk and advantages in mate acquisition.

Key words: courtship behavior, male mate choice, predation risk, reproductive trade-off, Syngnathus typhle, terminal investment.

Received 15 May 2006; revised 7 January 2007; accepted 25 January 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.