Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 14, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(4):742-749; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/4/742    most recent
arm042v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spataro, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Spataro, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Influence of environmental conditions on patch exploitation strategies of parasitoids

Thierry Spataro and Carlos Bernstein

Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université de Lyon; Université Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France

Address correspondence to T. Spataro, who is now at the USC INRA 1285 Ecologie des Populations et Communautés, AgroParisTech, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France. E-mail: Thierry.Spataro{at}agroparistech.fr.


  Abstract

In patchy environments, patch-leaving decision rules are a key component of the foraging behavior of parasitoids that have to share their searching time between the different host patches to optimize the number of ovipositions. It has been experimentally shown that one of the proximate cues involved in patch-leaving decision is the number of ovipositions performed by the parasitoid while in the patch. Ovipositions can have either a decremental or an incremental effect on the patch residence time depending on parasitoid species. Previous theoretical studies have suggested that environmental conditions and the ability of parasitoids to reliably estimate the number of available hosts on a patch when entering it should influence how patch departure depends on ovipositions. We developed an individual-based model to test a large variety of patch-leaving decision rules in different environmental conditions. This model includes a more realistic representation of individual acquisition of information than previous theoretical work. In accordance with previous results, we show that the best use of information depends on environmental conditions. Moreover, we identify the environmental factors that have a decisive influence on the most appropriate type of rule (incremental or decremental). Decremental mechanisms are most efficient only in restricted conditions characterized by a large number of patches and few parasitoids. The sensitivity of decision rules to frequency-dependent processes was tested by numerical invasibility experiments. Rare mutants using any alternative rule never outperform populations using a high-performance rule. Incremental rules seem to be more sensitive than decremental ones to frequency-dependent processes.

Key words: individual-based model, kairomone, optimal foraging, ovipositions, patch-leaving decisions, patchy environment.

Received 7 July 2006; revised 28 February 2007; accepted 1 April 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
E. M. Buchkremer and K. Reinhold
Sector fidelity--an advantageous foraging behavior resulting from a heuristic search strategy
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 984 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.