Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 12, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(4):750-757; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/4/750    most recent
arm043v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darbro, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Darbro, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, L. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Avian defensive behavior and blood-feeding success of the West Nile vector mosquito, Culex pipiens

Jonathan M. Darbro and Laura C. Harrington

Department of Entomology, 3138 Comstock Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14850, USA

Address correspondence to L.C. Harrington. E-mail: lch27{at}cornell.edu.


   Abstract

Avian defensive behavior against host-seeking arthropods influences transmission of vector-borne pathogens by affecting mosquito biting rate, either by preventing vector–host contact or by increasing the rate of multiple host feeding. We exposed house sparrows (Passer domesticus L.) and chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus L.) to Culex pipiens pipiens L. overnight in a large observation cage and measured avian defensive behavior rates and mosquito blood-feeding success. Both bird species exhibited a range of defensive behaviors, 90% of which were foot stomps, head movements, and wing shakes. Total behavior rates increased proportionately with mosquito density in both species, increased after the first hour of mosquito exposure, and decreased as individual birds were exposed to mosquitoes multiple times. Mosquito blood-feeding success on house sparrows was high overall (82 ± 5%) and independent of behavior rates. Blood-feeding success on chicks was lower (58 ± 5%) and negatively correlated with defensive behavior rate after the first hour of mosquito exposure. Results revealed a higher percentage of partial blood meals on chicks (18 ± 3% of all blood meals on chicks) than on house sparrows (4.9 ± 3%). Birds of both species ate an average of 9.4 ± 1.2% of mosquitoes, and this percentage was positively correlated with defensive behavior. High mosquito feeding success on house sparrows supports its role as a potential amplifying host of West Nile virus.

Key words: chicken, Culex p. pipiens, defensive behavior, house sparrow, mosquito, West Nile virus.

Received 10 February 2007; revised 26 March 2007; accepted 1 April 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
C. C. Jansen, C. E. Webb, G. C. Graham, S. B. Craig, P. Zborowski, S. A. Ritchie, R. C. Russell, and A. F. van den Hurk
Blood Sources of Mosquitoes Collected from Urban and Peri-Urban Environments in Eastern Australia with Species-Specific Molecular Analysis of Avian Blood Meals
Am J Trop Med Hyg, November 1, 2009; 81(5): 849 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
J. M. Darbro, A. A. Dhondt, F. M. Vermeylen, and L. C. Harrington
Mycoplasma gallisepticum Infection in House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) Affects Mosquito Blood Feeding Patterns
Am J Trop Med Hyg, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 488 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.