Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(5):895-904; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/5/895    most recent
arm049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brommer, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Komdeur, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brommer, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Komdeur, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Is extrapair mating random? On the probability distribution of extrapair young in avian broods

Jon E. Brommera, Peter Korstenb, Karen M. Bouwmanb, Mathew L. Bergb,c and Jan Komdeurb

a Bird Ecology Unit, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 65, (Viikinkaari 1), FIN–00014, Finland b Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, PO Box 14, 9750AA Haren, The Netherlands c School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK

Address correspondence to J.E. Brommer. E-mail: jon.brommer{at}helsinki.fi.


  Abstract

A dichotomy in female extrapair copulation (EPC) behavior, with some females seeking EPC and others not, is inferred if the observed distribution of extrapair young (EPY) over broods differs from a random process on the level of individual offspring (binomial, hypergeometrical, or Poisson). A review of the literature shows such null models are virtually always rejected, with often large effect sizes. We formulate an alternative null model, which assumes that 1) the number of EPC has a random (Poisson) distribution across females (broods) and that 2) the probability for an offspring to be of extrapair origin is zero without any EPC and increases with the number of EPC. Our brood-level model can accommodate the bimodality of both zero and medium rates of EPY typically found in empirical data, and fitting our model to EPY production of 7 passerine bird species shows evidence of a nonrandom distribution of EPY in only 2 species. We therefore argue that 1) dichotomy in extrapair mate choice cannot be inferred only from a significant deviation in the observed distribution of EPY from a random process on the level of offspring and that 2) additional empirical work on testing the contrasting critical predictions from the classic and our alternative null models is required.

Key words: extrapair copulation (EPC), likelihood, mate choice, null model, sexual selection.

Received 4 October 2006; revised 25 April 2007; accepted 16 May 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
O. Vedder, M. J.L. Magrath, A. M.F. Harts, E. Schut, M. van der Velde, and J. Komdeur
Reduced extrapair paternity in response to experimental stimulation of earlier incubation onset in blue tits
Behav. Ecol., October 30, 2009; (2009) arp145v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.