Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(5):958-966; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm067
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/5/958    most recent
arm067v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanckenhorn, W. U.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, P. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blanckenhorn, W. U.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, P. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Sexual conflict over copula timing: a mathematical model and a test in the yellow dung fly

Wolf U. Blanckenhorn, Benjamin I. Arthur, Patricia Meile and Paul I. Ward

Zoologisches Museum, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland

Address correspondence to W.U. Blanckenhorn. E-mail: wolf.blanckenhorn{at}zm.uzh.ch.


   Abstract

Sexual conflict over mating occurrence, timing, or duration is common in animals. This explains conspicuous female mate rejection behavior in many species, often involving shaking, fighting, and occasional forced copulations. We present a simple model that generates predictions about whether and when copulation occurs in such conflict situations and how much female rejection behavior should be observed. Predictions depend on 2 underlying parameters affecting female resistance and male persistence. We supply 2 qualitative tests of the model using the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae). We manipulated adult age, body size (large and small), and adult food availability (low and high), independently in males and females, staging replicate pairings of all treatment combinations. In agreement with predictions of our model, shaking duration first increased to a maximum at intermediate age, when the average female copulated, and then decreased again. Contrary to expectation, body size did not affect copulation timing, female resistance, or male persistence. As predicted, adult food limitation delayed sexual maturity and hence prolonged female resistance, resulting in later copulations after more shaking. However, although food limitation equally delayed the increase in male persistence with age, copulation also occurred later after more shaking, opposite to the model prediction. We conclude that shaking is driven primarily by female age and male responses to it. Although female shaking can initially successfully deter males in S. stercoraria, this behavior is subtle and has apparently shifted function from an effective means of mate choice to a signal of nonreceptivity, though its importance in nature remains unclear.

Key words: body size, copulation duration, food limitation, Scathophaga stercoraria, Scatophaga, sexual conflict, sexual selection.

Received 18 June 2007; revised 18 June 2007; accepted 18 June 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.