Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on August 16, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(6):1021-1028; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm071
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/1021    most recent
arm071v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larison, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Larison, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Environmental heterogeneity and alternative mating tactics in the damselfly Protoneura amatoria

Brenda Larison

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Address correspondence to B. Larison. E-mail: blarison{at}ucla.edu.


   Abstract

Conditional male mating strategies have been studied extensively in relation to male attributes, such as size and resource-holding potential, but few studies have considered the effects of environmental heterogeneity on the use of alternative mating tactics. In some systems, environmental heterogeneity may be the key to understanding the evolution and maintenance of such polyphenisms. I examined the influence of the physical environment on the use of alternative tactics by the damselfly Protoneura amatoria. Male P. amatoria reversibly use 2 tactics to gain matings: 1) sit and wait in the canopy for passing females or 2) hover over the water and attempt to grab females that are ovipositing in floating debris. Observations in 3 streams indicated that the use of the hovering tactic was greater under high-light than low-light conditions and at higher densities of ovipositing females. The density of ovipositing females was correlated with both the light conditions and the availability of oviposition substrate, indicating that physical factors exert indirect as well as direct influences on tactic use. Experimental manipulations showed that both males and females responded directly to light conditions and suggested that males responded directly to the density of ovipositing females. These results can be explained largely in terms of the cues and constraints inherent in different light environments. Thus, the conditional mating strategy of P. amatoria appears to have evolved in response to, and been maintained by, fine-scale variation in the physical environment. These findings are discussed in relation to flight dynamics and predation risk.

Key words: Odonata, phenotypic plasticity, Protoneuridae, Zygoptera.

Received 3 February 2007; revised 12 July 2007; accepted 12 July 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.