Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on September 10, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(6):1082-1084; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/1082    most recent
arm079v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krams, I.
Right arrow Articles by Mänd, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krams, I.
Right arrow Articles by Mänd, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Long-lasting mobbing of the pied flycatcher increases the risk of nest predation

Indrikis Kramsa, Tatjana Kramab, Kristine Igaunea and Raivo Mändb

a Institute of Systematic Biology, University of Daugavpils, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia b Institute of Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Tartu, 51014, Tartu, Estonia

Address correspondence to I. Krams. E-mail: indrikis.krams{at}biology.lv.


   Abstract

Mobbing behavior may provide real benefits because mobbing prey individuals often cause a predator to leave the vicinity. However, mobbing calls of prey can attract acoustically oriented predators thus increasing nest predation. Therefore, a real value of mobbing as a type of adaptive behavior may depend on its duration. In this experimental study, we tested whether mobbing duration by the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca, a small hole-nesting passerine, increases the risk of nest predation. From the top of one nest-box within each of 78 experimental plots, we played back long calls of pied flycatchers, whereas recordings of short mobbing calls were played back from the top of another nearby nest-box. The nest-boxes were arranged in pairs, and each of them contained a quail Coturnix coturnix egg. Long-call nest-boxes were depredated by martens Martes martes significantly more often than short-call nest-boxes. This predator usually hunts by night and may eavesdrop on the calls of their mobbing prey while resting nearby during the day. The results of the present study show that long-lasting conspicuous mobbing calls may carry a significant cost for the breeding birds.

Key words: antipredator behavior, Ficedula hypoleuca, long-lasting mobbing, mobbing costs, pied flycatcher.

Received 18 May 2005; revised 18 July 2007; accepted 5 August 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. Naguib, R. Schmidt, P. Sprau, T. Roth, C. Florcke, and V. Amrhein
The ecology of vocal signaling: male spacing and communication distance of different song traits in nightingales
Behav. Ecol., June 17, 2008; (2008) arn065v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.