Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on October 15, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(1):22-34; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm096
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/1/22    most recent
arm096v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broom, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kilner, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Broom, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kilner, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Host life-history strategies and the evolution of chick-killing by brood parasitic offspring

Mark Brooma, Graeme D. Ruxtonb and Rebecca M. Kilnerc

a Department of Mathematics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RF, UK b Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK c Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

Address correspondence to R.M. Kilner. E-mail: rmk1002{at}hermes.cam.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Nestling brood parasites vary in the harm that they do to their companions in the nest. Here we use a game-theoretical model to attempt to account for this variation. Our model considers hosts that might routinely abandon single nestlings, regardless of whether they are host young or brood parasites and choose instead to reallocate their reproductive effort to future breeding. The nestling brood parasite must decide whether or not to kill all host young by balancing the benefits it stands to gain from reduced competition in the nest against the risk of desertion by host parents. The model predicts that 3 different types of evolutionarily stable strategies can exist. 1) When hosts routinely rear depleted broods, the brood parasite always kills host young, and the host never then abandons the nest. 2) Conversely, when adult survival after deserting single offspring is very high, hosts always abandon broods of one young, and the parasite never kills host offspring. 3) Intermediate strategies can also be evolutionarily stable, in which parasites sometimes kill their nest mates, and host parents sometimes desert nests that contain only a single chick. We provide quantitative descriptions of how the values given to ecological and behavioral parameters of the host-parasite system influence the probability of each strategy and compare our results with host–brood parasite associations seen in nature.

Key words: cowbird, cuckoo, desertion, eviction, virulence.

Received 8 December 2006; revised 12 September 2007; accepted 17 September 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
R. J.S. Ward, S. C. Cotter, and R. M. Kilner
Current brood size and residual reproductive value predict offspring desertion in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1274 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.