Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on November 15, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(1):35-40; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm097
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/1/35    most recent
arm097v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Janzen, F. J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Janzen, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Does predator swamping promote synchronous emergence of turtle hatchlings among nests?

John K. Tuckera, Gary L. Paukstisb,* and Fredric J. Janzenc

a Great Rivers Field Station, Illinois Natural History Survey, 8450 Montclaire Avenue, Brighton, IL 62012-2032, USA b 1404 143rd Place NE, Bellevue, WA 98007, USA c Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1020, USA

Address correspondence to J.K. Tucker. E-mail: jktucker{at}inhs.uiuc.edu.


   Abstract

The spatial and temporal synchrony observed for many behaviors is often viewed as deriving from selection to swamp predators, ensuring that at least some individual prey survive. However, this adaptive explanation has rarely been put to experimental test. We conducted 2 field experiments to evaluate the importance of alternative mechanisms (predator swamping and prey switching) to explain synchronous emergence among nests by red-eared slider turtle hatchlings (Trachemys scripta elegans) that initiates the critical migration from nests to water. In the 1998 experiment, we released 1400 hatchlings simultaneously and allowed another 1400 hatchlings to emerge independently from artificial nests. Hatchlings emerging from nests were just as likely to be recaptured as those in the mass release. Moreover, survivorship was highest among nests whose hatchlings began emerging early compared with hatchlings that emerged from nests later during migration. In the 2006 experiment, we released 2 groups of 100 hatchlings 8 days apart and a third group of 300 hatchlings 13 days later. We recaptured more than twice as many hatchlings from the first group as from the similar sized second group and from the larger third group. If the predator swamping mechanism had been important, we should have seen improved survivorship for the hatchlings in the mass release in the first experiment and for hatchlings in the third group in the second experiment. Overall, the results reject predator swamping as an explanation. Our findings instead suggest that synchronous emergence of turtle hatchlings from nests across a population maximizes individual survival by minimizing exposure to prey-switching predators.

Key words: body size, hatchling behavior, natural selection, predation risk, survivorship, synchrony, turtle.


* Deceased.

Received 14 September 2006; revised 12 July 2007; accepted 23 September 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.