Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 18, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(2):279-284; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm134
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/279    most recent
arm134v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bulmer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gil, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bulmer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gil, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Parent-absent begging: evidence for sibling honesty and cooperation in the spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor)

Elena Bulmera, Patricia Celisb and Diego Gila

a Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, E-28006 Madrid, Spain b School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY19 9TS, UK

Address correspondence to D. Gil. E-mail: dgil{at}mncn.csic.es.


   Abstract

Begging in avian nestlings is a highly conspicuous behavior with important implications for the study of parent–offspring conflict. In some species, nestlings also call for long bouts in the absence of parents, and it has been proposed that this behavior is used by nestlings as a means of negotiating access to food. We studied this phenomenon in the spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor). We found that parent-absent calls were acoustically distinct from parent-present calls. Observations showed that the probability of parent-absent begging increased with nestling age and brood size, whereas it decreased with increasing body condition. This result was confirmed by an experiment that showed that nestlings produced higher parent-absent begging rates when food deprived than when satiated. Finally, we carried out a playback experiment to test the reaction of nestlings to parent-absent begging by fellow nestlings. Principle components analyses yielded 2 independent components of begging: 1) a general begging component and 2) a second factor that measures the relative contribution of communicative begging over competitive begging. Nestlings exposed to playback decreased their general begging levels and simultaneously increased the relative contribution of communicative over competitive begging. This behavior may favor needy nestlings to obtain impending feedings while keeping high levels of food solicitation from parents and is consistent with a cooperative strategy among nestlings. Future research should consider the actual response of parents to these signals.

Key words: begging in the absence of parents, food deprivation, sibling competition, sibling negotiation, spotless starling, Sturnus unicolor.

Received 6 October 2006; revised 1 October 2007; accepted 29 October 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. G. McDonald, D. R. Wilson, and C. S. Evans
Nestling begging increases predation risk, regardless of spectral characteristics or avian mobbing
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2009; 20(4): 821 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.