Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 12, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(2):309-316; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm132
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/309    most recent
arm132v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanpé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hewison, A. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vanpé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hewison, A. J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Mating system, sexual dimorphism, and the opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial ungulate

Cécile Vanpéa,b, Petter Kjellanderb, Maxime Galana,c, Jean-François Cossonc, Stéphane Aulagniera, Olof Libergb and A. J. Mark Hewisona

a Laboratoire Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune Sauvage, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, BP 52627, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France b Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 73091 Riddarhyttan, Sweden c Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, CS30016, F 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France

Address correspondence to A.J. Mark Hewison. E-mail: hewison{at}toulouse.inra.fr.


   Abstract

In mammals, species with high sexual size dimorphism tend to have highly polygynous mating systems associated with high variance in male lifetime reproductive success (LRS), leading to a high opportunity for sexual selection. However, little information is available for species with weak sexual size dimorphism. In a long-term study population, we used parentage analysis based on 21 microsatellite markers to describe, for the first time, variance in male lifetime breeding success (LBS) of roe deer, a territorial ungulate where males weigh less than 10% more than females. LBS ranged from 0 to 14 (mean = 4.54, variance = 15.5), and its distribution was highly skewed, with only a few males obtaining high LBS and many males failing to breed or siring only one fawn. As predicted for polygynous species with low sexual size dimorphism, the standardized variance in male LBS was low (Im = 0.75) and was only slightly higher than the standardized variance in female LRS (If = 0.53), suggesting a low opportunity for sexual selection. The Im value reported here for roe deer is much lower than values reported for highly dimorphic ungulates such as red deer (Im > 3). We suggest that, along a continuum of opportunity for sexual selection, roe deer occupy a position closer to monogamous and monomorphic territorial ungulates than to highly polygynous, sexually dimorphic ungulates with dominance rank–based mating systems such as harems or roving mating systems.

Key words: Capreolus capreolus, lifetime reproductive success, microsatellite, paternity analysis, roe deer, ungulates.

Received 8 December 2006; revised 10 July 2007; accepted 7 November 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.