Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 13, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(2):317-324; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm131
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Social constraints limit dispersal and settlement decisions in a group-living bird species
a Population Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden b Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK c Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, Turku University, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
Address correspondence to M. Griesser. E-mail: michael.griesser{at}ebc.uu.se. M. Nystrand is now at the Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawely 6009, Australia. S. Eggers is now at the Department of Conservation Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7002, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Dispersal is a fundamental process affecting the genetic structure of populations, speciation, and extinction. Nevertheless, our understanding of the evolution of dispersal is limited by our paucity of knowledge on dispersal decisions at the individual level. We investigated the effect of interactions between residents and juvenile dispersers on individual dispersal and settlement decisions in Siberian jays (Perisoreus infaustus). In this group-living bird species, some offspring remain on the parental territory for up to 3 years (retained juveniles) whereas other offspring disperse within 2 months of fledging (dispersers). We found that retained juveniles constrained settlement decisions of dispersers by aggressively chasing dispersers off their territory, resulting in dispersers continuing to disperse and settling in groups without retained juveniles. Experimental removal of male breeders during the dispersal period also demonstrated that dispersers were unable to settle in high-quality breeding openings, which were instead filled by older nonbreeding residents. Rather, dispersers immigrated into groups without retained offspring where they became subordinate group members, queuing for a breeding opening. Also, they preferably settled in groups with short queues where no same-sex juveniles were present. Dispersal did not inflict a cost to dispersers through increased mortality. However, the presence of immigrants was costly for breeders because it increased the rate of conflicts during the breeding season which negatively affected nestling condition. These results demonstrate that resident individuals constrain both dispersal and settlement decisions of dispersers. Social interactions between residents and dispersers can thus be a key factor to understand the evolution of dispersal.
Key words: dispersal cost, movement, natal dispersal, queuing strategies.
Received 9 November 2006; revised 24 July 2007; accepted 8 November 2007.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Griesser and M. Nystrand Vigilance and predation of a forest-living bird species depend on large-scale habitat structure Behav. Ecol., May 6, 2009; (2009) arp045v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Buston and A. G. Zink Reproductive skew and the evolution of conflict resolution: a synthesis of transactional and tug-of-war models Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 672 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|